Literatura | Literature

Acker, S. (1980), Women, the Other Academics, British Journal of Sociology of Education, vol. 1(1), pp. 81-91.

Aksnes, Dag W., Kristoffer Rørstad, Fredrik Niclas Piro and Gunnar Sivertsen (2011), Are female researchers less cited? A large scale study of Norwegian researchers, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (JASIST), vol. 62(4), pp. 628-636.

Auriol, L. (2010), Careers of doctorate holders: employment and mobility patterns, STI working paper 2010/4, OECD.

Bagilhole, B. (2000), Too Little Too Late? An Assessment of National Initiatives for Women Academics in British University System, Higher Education in Europe, vol. 25(2), pp. 139-145.

Blank, Rebecca (1991), The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from the American Economic Review, American Economic Review, vol. 81:5, pp. 1041–067.

Bornmann, L., Mutz, R. and H. D. Daniel (2007), Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis, Journal of Informetrics, vol. 1, pp. 226–238.

Borsuk, R. M., Aarssen, L. W., Budden, A. E., Koricheva, J., Leimu, R., Tregenza, T. and C. J. Lortie (2009a), To Name or Not to Name: The Effect of Changing Author Gender on Peer Review, BioScience , vol. 59, 11, pp. 985-989.

Borsuk, R. M., Budden, A. E., Leimu, R., Aarssen, L. W. and C. J. Lortie (2009b), The influence of author gender, national language and number of authors on citation rate in ecology, Open Ecology Journal, vol. 2, pp. 25-28.

Budden, A. E, Tregenza, T., Aarssen, L. W., Koricheva, J., Leimu, R. and C. J. Lortie (2007), Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors, TRENDS in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 23, 1, pp. 4- 6.

Campbell, E. G., Weissman, J. S., Causino, N. and D. Blumenthal (2000), Data withholding in academic medicine: characteristics of faculty denied access to research results and biomaterials, Research Policy, vol. 29, 2, pp. 303-312.

Ceci S. J. and W. M. Williams (2007), Why Aren’t More Women in Science? Top Researchers Debate the Evidence, American Psychological Association. Washington, D.C.

Cipriani, G. P. and A. Zago (2011), Productivity or discrimination? Beauty and the exams, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, vol. 73, 3, pp. 428-447.

Clayton, J. (2011), Fix The System, Not The Women, Science magazine Career, The AAAS/Science Custom Publishing Office.

Dasgupta, N. (2011), Ingroup experts and peers as social vaccines who inoculate the self-concept: the stereotype inoculation model, Psychological Inquiry, vol. 22, pp. 231-246.

Davenport, E. and H. Snyder (1995), Who cites women? Whom do women cite?: an exploration of gender and scholarly citation in sociology, Journal of Documentation, vol. 51, 4, pp. 404-410.

Deem, R. (2003), Gender, Organizational Cultures and the Practices of Manger-Academics in UK Universities in Gender, Work and Organization, vol. 10(2), pp. 239-259.

Devine, P.G. (1989), Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 56(1), pp. 5–18.

Domaradzka, A. and D. Walczak (2012a), Wartość autoteliczna i instrumentalna studiów doktoranckich w opinii doktorantów i absolwentów, Raport z badań (Autotelic and instrumental value of doctoral studies in opinion of doctoral students and graduates. Research report).

Domaradzka, A. and D. Walczak (2012b, in print), Kuźnia talentów czy przechowalnia? Rola studiów doktoranckich w opinii doktorantów (Place for honing talents or a waiting room? The role of doctoral studies in: Pakuła, J. (ed.) Współczesne problemy nauki i szkolnictwa wyższego (Contemporary problems of science and higher education).

Domaradzka, A. and L. Widla (2009), Raport: Sposoby finansowania niepublicznych szkół wyższych, (Report: Sources of financing of private universities), Warszawa: Stowarzyszenia Edukacja w Otwartym Społeczeństwie.

Enders, J. and L. Bornmann (2001), Karriere mit Doktortitel? Ausbildung, Berufsverlauf und Berofserfolg von Promovierten, Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.

Engqvist, L. and J. G. Frommen (2008), Double-blind peer review and gender publication bias, Animal Behaviour, vol. 76(3).

Fienberg, S.E. and M. E. Martin (1985), Sharing research data, National Academy Press, Washington.

Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, A. T., Uhlmann, E. L. and M. R. Banaji (2009), Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-Analysis of Predictive Validity, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 97, 1, pp. 17-41.

Haapakorpi, A. (2012), A career outside the academy? Doctorate holders in the Finnish professional labour market, Paper, CHER-conference, Beograd.

Högskoleverket (2007), Forskarutbildades etablering på arbeidsmarknaden, Rapport 2007:56 R. Stockholm: Högskoleverket.

Husu, L. (2000), Gender Discrimination in the Promised Land of Gender Equality, Higher Education in Europe, vol. 25(2), pp. 221-228.

Hyde, J.S. and J. E. Mertz (2009), Gender, culture, and mathematics performance, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 106, 22, pp. 8801-8807.

Izquierdo, M. J. and F. J. León (2007), Gender Bias And Evaluating Academic Quality, Report from 1st International Congress 12-14 December 2007.

Jacob, B. and S. Levitt (2003), Rotten Apples: An Investigation of the Prevalence and Predictors of Teacher Cheating, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 118, 3, pp. 843-877.

Krawczyk, M. (2011), A model of procedural and distributive fairness, Theory and Decision, vol. 70(1), pp. 111-128.

Krawczyk, M. (2012), The search for significance. A few peculiarities in the distribution of p values, American Statistician (second revision).

Krawczyk, M. and P. Kusztelak (2012), Understanding the gender entrepreneurship gap: a framed field experiment, Feminist Economics (revision).

Krawczyk, M and E. Reuben (2012), (Un)available upon request. Field experiment on researchers’ willingness to share supplementary materials. Accountability in Research, vol. 19(3).

Kyvik, S. and T. B. Olsen (2012), The relevance of doctoral training in different labour markets, Journal of Education and Work, vol. 25, pp. 205-224.

Merritt, R. D. and T. W. Harrison (2006), Gender and Ethnicity Attributions to a Gender- and Ethnicity- Unspecified Individual: Is there a People=White Male Bias? Sex Roles, vol. 54, pp. 787-797.

Milkman, K. L., Akinola, M. and D. Chugh (Working), Heterogeneity in Discrimination?: A Field Experiment.

Monroe, K., Ozyurt, S., Wrigley, T. and A. Alexander (2008), Gender equality in academia: Bad news from the trenches, and some possible solutions, Perspectives on politics, vol. 6, 2, pp. 215-233.

Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J.F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J. and J. Handelsman (2012), Science Faculty’s Subtle gender Biases Favor Male Students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Primack, R. B, Ellwood, E., Miller-Rushing, A. J., Marrs, R. and A. Mulligan (2009), Do gender, nationality, or academic age affect review decisions? An analysis of submissions to the journal Biological Conservation, Biological Conservation, vol. 142, pp. 2415–2418.

Ragins, B. R. (1998), Gender gap in the executive suite: CEOs and female executives report on breaking the glass ceiling, The Academy of Management Executive, vol. 12, 1, pp. 28-42.

Report: Mapping the Maze: Getting more Women to the Top in Research, European Commission 2008. Report: The Gender Challenge in Research Funding, European Commission 2009.

Santiago, R., T. Carvalho and A. Vabø (2012), Personal characteristics, career trajectories and sense of identity among male and female acdemics in Norway and Portugal, in: Vukasovic, M., P. Maassen, M. Nerland, R. Pinheiro, B. Stensaker and A. Vabø (eds.) Effects of higher education reforms: Change dynamics, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

She Figures (2012), Brussels: European Commission.

Siemienska, R. (1992), Academic Carriers in Poland: Does Gender Makes a Difference?, Higher Education in Europe, vol. 17(2), pp. 60-84.

Siemienska, R. (2000), Women in Academe in Poland: Winners among Losers? (from the perspective of ten years of economic and political transformation in Poland in the 1990s), Higher Education in Europe vol. XXV/2, pp. 163-172.

Siemienska, R. (2001), Academe as a Space for Women and a Place for the Study and Promotion of Gender Equality in Poland, in Grunberg, Laura (ed.) Good Practice in Promoting Gender Equality in Higher Education in Central and Eastern Europe, Bucharest: UNESCO-CEPES, pp. 59-84.

Siemienska, R. (2003), Gender and Careers of Highly Skilled in Poland, in: Domsch, Michel E., Desiree, H. Ladwig and Eliane Tenten (eds.) Gender Equality in Central and Eastern European Countries, Frankfurt am Main – Berlin- New York – Oxford – Wien: Peter Lang, pp. 205-230.

Siemienska, R. (2006), Polish Universities as a Place of Study and Academic Careers: Class and Gender Consideration, in: Allen, W.R. et al. (eds.) Higher Education in a Global Society: Achieving Diversity, Equity and Excellence, Amsterdam – Boston – Oxford -Paris – Sydney – Tokio: Elsvier, pp. 51-90.

Siemienska, R. (2007), The Puzzle of Gender Research Productivity in Polish Universities, in: (ed. with A. Zimmer) Gendered Career Trajectories in Academia in Cross-National Perspective, Warsaw: Scholar, pp. 241- 266.

Siemienska, R. (2009), Poland, in: The Gender Challenge in Research Funding, Assessing the European National Scenes, Brussels: European Commission Report, Directorate L Science, Economy and Society, Scientific Culture and Gender Issues.

Siemieńska, R. and D. Walczak (2012), Polish Higher Education: From State towards Market, from Elite to Mass education, in: Allen, Walter (ed.) (2012), As the World Turns: Implications of Global Shifts in Higher Education for Theory, Research and Practice, Emerald Group Publishing, United Kingdom, pp. 197-224.

Siemienska, R. and A. Zimmer (eds.) (2007), Gendered Career Trajectories in Academia in Cross-National Perspective. Warsaw: Scholar.

Smith, D. G. et al. (1997), Diversity Works: The Emerging Picture of How Students Benefit. Washington, D.C.: Association of American Colleges and Universities.

Steinpreis, R. E., Anders, K. A. and D. Ritzke (1999), The impact of gender on the review of the curricula vitae of job applicants and tenure candidates: A national empirical study, Sex roles, vol. 41(7), pp. 509-528.

Stout, J. G. (2009), When he doesn’t mean you: gender-exclusive language as a form of subtle ostracism, Master’s thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

Swim, J. K., Borgida, E., Maruyama, G. and D. G. Myers (1989), Joan McKay versus John McKay: Do gender stereotypes bias evaluations? Psychological Bulletin, vol. 105(3), pp. 409–429.

Tregenza, T. (2002) Gender bias in the refereeing process? TRENDS in Ecology & Evolution, vol. 17, 8, pp. 349-350.

Vabø, A., Padilla, L. and E. Waagene (2012), Gender and Faculty Internationalization, in: Fuato, H., Finkelstein M. and M. Rostan, The Internationalization of the Academy: Changes, Realities and Prospects, Springer (upcoming publication).

Vitae (2009), What do researchers do? First destinations of doctoral graduates by subject, Cambridge: The Careers Research and Advisory Centre (CRAC) Limited.

Vitae (2010), What do researchers do? Doctoral graduate destinations and impact three years on, Cambridge: The Careers Research and Advisory Centre (CRAC) Limited.

Vitae (2011), What do researchers do? Career paths of doctoral graduates, Cambridge: The Careers Research and Advisory Centre (CRAC) Limited.

Vitae (2012), What do researchers want to do? The career intentions of doctoral researchers, Cambridge: The Careers Research and Advisory Centre (CRAC) Limited.

Walby, S. (2011), Is the Knowledge Society Gendered? Gender, Work and Organization, vol. 18, 1.

Walczak, D. (2011), PhD dissertation on mobility of faculty members and students in Poland.

Wenneras, C. and A. Wold (1997), Nepotism and sexism in peer-review, Nature, vol. 387, pp. 341–343.

Xie, Y. and K. A. Shauman (2003), Women in Science, Career Processes and Outcomes, Harvard University Press.

Yenstch, C. M. and C.J. Sidermann (2003), The Women Scientists, Meeting the Challenges for a Successful Career, Basic Books.